Skip to content

The Obama Body Count

How many people will die because of the fraud that sits in the oval office? We’ll find out.

1. Lt. Quarles Harris Jr.

Police say a “shot spotter” device helped an officer locate Lt. Harris.

A State Department spokeswoman yesterday declined to comment, saying the investigation into the passport fraud is ongoing.

The Washington Times reported April 5 that contractors for the State Department had improperly accessed passport information for presidential candidates Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton, Barack Obama and John McCain, which resulted in a series of firings that reached into the agency’s top ranks.

2. Civilians killed in Iraq since Obama was elected:

Obama Body Count

3. Donald Young

4. 2009 What the MSM won’t tell you

So far this month[September 2009], 38 American troops have been killed in Afghanistan. For all of 2009, the number is 220more than any other single year and more than died in 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004 combined.

5. End of month; September 2009 Deaths since General McChrystal requested more troops. ONE MONTH.

On August 30, Gen. Stanley McChrystal sent Defense Secretary Robert Gates a war assessment in which he said more U.S. troops–and a new U.S. strategy–are needed if the U.S. is to defeat the insurgents in Afghanistan:

The names of 42 of the 43 American servicemen killed in Afghanistan since August 30 are listed below, as provided by the U.S. Defense Department. The most recent troop to die in combat–on Wednesday, according to press reports–had not been identified at press time. Another eight Americans were killed in Iraq over the past month. Their names are included in bold print. (For full details on each soldier please visit this link: CNS News

Lance Cpl. Jordan L. Chrobot

Spc. Kevin J. Graham

Sgt. Titus R. Reynolds

Lance Cpl. John J. Malone

Pfc. William L. Meredith

Tech Sgt. James R Hornbarger

Sgt. David A. Davis

Spc. Corey J. Kowall

Iraq: Spc. Michael S. Cote Jr.

Senior Airman Matthew R. Courtois

Pfc. Jeremiah J. Monroe

Sgt. 1st Class Bradley S. Bohle

Sgt. Robert D. Gordon II

1st Lt. David T. Wright II

Spc. Demetrius L. Void

Staff Sgt. Bryan D. Berky

Staff Sgt. Nekl B. Allen

Pfc. Matthew M. Martinek

Iraq: Sgt. 1st Class Duane A. Thornsbury

Sgt. Tyler A. Juden

1st Lt. Tyler E. Parten,

Lance Cpl. Christopher S. Fowlkes

Iraq: Staff Sgt. Shannon M. Smith

Sgt. Youvert Loney

Gunnery Sgt. Edwin W. Johnson Jr.

Petty Officer 3rd Class James R. Layton

Capt. Joshua S. Meadows

Iraq: 1st Lt. Joseph D. Helton

Staff Sgt. Michael C. Murphrey

Sgt. Randy M. Haney

2nd Lt. Darryn D. Andrews

Lance Cpl. Christopher S. Baltazar Jr.

Petty Officer 3rd Class Benjamin P. Castiglione

Iraq: Staff Sgt. Todd W. Selge

Spc. Tyler R. Walshe

Spc. Jonathan D. Welch

Lance Cpl. David R. Hall

6. 10 TROOPS KILLED IN DEADLIEST BATTLE OF YEAR

October 5, 2009

Eight American soldiers and two Afghan policemen were killed, with many injured. It was the worst attack on Nato forces in 14 months, and one of the deadliest battles of the eight-year war. The insurgents seized at least 20 Afghan policemen whose fate last night remained unclear.

7. 14 Americans killed in 2 Afghan helicopter crashes

Helicopter crashes killed 14 Americans on Monday—11 troops and three drug agents—in the deadliest day for the U.S. mission in Afghanistan in more than four years. The deaths came as President Barack Obama prepared to meet his national security team for a sixth full-scale conference on the future of the troubled war.

In the deadliest crash, a helicopter went down in the west of the country after leaving the scene of a firefight, killing 10 Americans—seven troops and three Drug Enforcement Administration agents. Eleven American troops, one U.S. civilian and 14 Afghans were also injured.

In a separate incident, two U.S. Marine helicopters—one UH-1 and an AH-1 Cobra—collided in flight before sunrise over the southern province of Helmand, killing four American troops and wounding two more, Marine spokesman Maj. Bill Pelletier said.

It was the heaviest single-day loss of life since June 28, 2005, when 16 U.S. troops on a special forces helicopter died when their MH-47 Chinook helicopter was shot down by insurgents. The casualties also mark the first DEA deaths in Afghanistan since it began operations there in 2005.

U.S. authorities have ruled out hostile fire in the collision but have not given a cause for the other fatal crash in the west. Taliban spokesman Qari Yusuf Ahmedi claimed Taliban fighters shot down a helicopter in northwest Badghis province’s Darabam district. It was impossible to verify the claim and unclear if he was referring to the same incident.

8. Eight more added to the Obama Body Count…

Eight U.S. service members working for the NATO-led force and one Afghan civilian were killed in multiple bomb attacks in southern Afghanistan on Tuesday, the alliance said in a statement.

The NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) said several troops were also wounded in the “multiple complex (bomb) attacks” but would not give further details of the attacks, which come a day after 11 U.S. troops were killed in two helicopter crashes.

9. Fort Hood Texas massacre of 13 US soldiers and 1 unborn child

President Obama says “we cannot fully know” what led Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan to kill 13 people and wound 38 others at Fort Hood, Texas Thursday.

Hasan reportedly shouted “Allahu Akbar!” before the killings, wrote Internet postings justifying Muslim suicide bombings, considered U.S. forces the enemy, and opposed American involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan as wars on Islam. His rampage at Ft. Hood has the markings of an act of Islamic terrorism.

10. CIA probes Afghan base security after bomber kills 7

The CIA vowed on Thursday to avenge the deaths of seven officers in a suicide bombing in Afghanistan and to investigate security breaches that allowed the second deadliest attack in agency history.

The Taliban claimed the attacker was a sympathizer from the Afghan army who detonated a vest of explosives at a meeting with CIA workers on Wednesday. An Afghan was also killed and six CIA employees were wounded, U.S. officials said.

11. Nato loses 10 troops in deadly Afghanistan day

In the worst of several attacks, five US soldiers died in an improvised bomb blast in east Afghanistan, the US said.

Five other Nato troops were killed in a spate of attacks across the country’s restive South and East, where Isaf is battling the Taliban.

The militants have been waging a battle to overthrow the US-backed government.

The UK Ministry of Defence said no British troops were killed in Monday’s attacks.

Advertisements
30 Comments leave one →
  1. July 21, 2009 11:29 am

    What was Bush’s body count?

    • July 21, 2009 2:19 pm

      *shrugs* Beats me. I do need to update this though – since this month was the deadliest out of all of the eight years we’ve been in IRAQ.

  2. September 5, 2009 9:37 pm

    RP,

    Excuse me…but Bushies days are over…we are now in the hope and change era…so we are concerned with the BHO/Lucifer body count…not Georgie boys so get over it!

    • September 5, 2009 9:50 pm

      GASPZ… but SURELY EVERYTHING that goes wrong during BHO’s reign of terror HAS to be pinned on BUSH! TAHT IZ HOW IT WORKZ NOW!

      How many times did you hear President Bush BASH the Clintons? Oh the hilarity.

  3. witackman permalink
    September 14, 2009 11:29 pm

    Why defend Bush? His government was awful. His govt did not do one positive thing, and they did a lot of awful things. Like torture innocent people; bomb innocent people; send stupid kids off to yet another war. Not to mention that the poor have only got poorer under Bush, whilst the rich have brought on a massive recession crisis – which will cost the middle classes their pensions, and cost the lower classes their jobs.

    • September 15, 2009 12:30 am

      Why defend Obama? His governmend is awful. It hasn’t accomplished one positive thing. Torture isn’t an issue. It’s just something the Obama admin uses to take focus off of the corruption he’s doing. Waterboarding? Get real. Besides, these are people that brutally massacred 3,000 of my American brothers and sisters. They torture, rape, and behead people and capture it on FILM. Then they release it. For what? Nothing productive – just hate. Our “torture” got us information that saved American lives, and it’s been proven to have worked more than once.

      Under Bush, I was poor. I worked hard, I paid my way through school, I paid my own bills, I saved up money for the luxury items I wanted. Eventually I found myself in a better financial position. Imagine that: work hard, make money, get a better quality of life. Believe me when I tell you that I MORE than qualified for “government assistance” but refused to take it. Instead, I cut luxuries out of my life. I lived within my means, and eventually I did get myself where I am today. Of course, the unemployment rates under Bush’s administration were microscopic compared to the outrageous rates under BarryO. So, how you think that the poor got poorer under Bush is beyond me – because I sure didn’t. Nobody I know did. However, under BarryO – I see that the RICH are getting poorer, the POOR are getting poorer, and there’s no sign of an economic boost anytime soon.

      Also, my father served in IRAQ. When can you tell me that we bombed innocent people? Also, why would you think that those who are sent to war are “stupid kids”? Do you think that everyone that joins the military is a “stupid kid”? Because I’m planning on joining myself, and no, I’m not a pussy, no I’m not scared of war, and yes, I understand that it is a VERY real possibility that I’ll be shipped out to war. Unlike Cindy Sheehan who just HAS to wipe her ass on the memory of her dead son who SHOULD be remembered as a HERO who died in the line of duty – she runs around, flapping her gums about how war is stupid and bad and wah wah wah. Face time is all that troll is about. He DIDN’T get drafted into the military – and for her to think that her son would NEEEEEEVVVVVERRRRR everrr go off to war is just naive. That’s the JOB of a soldier. What if every fireman bitched and moaned every time they were expected to go into a burning house to rescue a family? Wouldn’t that sound silly? What if every doctor cried the blues whenever they had to perform a risky surgery. Wouldn’t that just be dumb? Of course it would.

      Now, you would be correct in your comment if you would replace “BUSH” with “OBAMA” because everything you said happened under Bush is happening times FIFTY under BarryO. Minus the torture. He likes to free terrorists and force the taxpayers to fund their luxury lifestyle in Bermuda – AGAINST the wishes of the people of Bermuda. David Miliband even complained about it.

      So, where are these jobs that “Bush Lost”? Since the great and glorious BarryO is in power – wouldn’t you think that… GASPZ… JOBZ WOULD BE MADE?! OMGZ.

      Nice try.

  4. October 8, 2009 11:44 pm

    Hey Danger B.
    Bob A. here. Good news from Obama, unemployment is getting worse slower. What a joke, isn’t it supposed to be getting better? Obamao must go.

    • October 9, 2009 12:42 am

      He will. His numbers are plummeting so fast it’s frightening. Never in my life have I seen a presidential approval rating drop at such an early point in a “presidency”. Our enemies see him as weak, our citizens see him as a fraud, and even his supporters are starting to see the damage he’s doing. Broken promises, false ideas of Utopia. The jobs? Take a look at MICHIGAN. People are finally starting to live life like he SAID we do. Poverty stricken, unable to make the bills; going without food and basic necessities; scaling down. He’s destroying America… and the American dream.

      We need a Reagan. STAT.

  5. October 9, 2009 10:39 pm

    I sincerely wish HATE MONGERS like Glen Beck, Sara Palin and Bill O’Rieley

    1. Get educated on the facts for themselves instead of blindly following what the Republican Cult Leaders say.

    2. Start offering viable solutions instead of spewing hatred.

    3. Stop turning a huge profit by propagating their own obvious and deep seeded hatred of America.

    • October 10, 2009 1:59 am

      I’m not a fan of Glenn Beck myself. Sarah Palin, hell yes. I think she owns. Bill O’reilly is a phony.

      1. Who the hell is a republican? Aside from Bill O’reilly (maybe)
      2. What does this have to do with this page on my site?
      3. Have you read “Dreams From My Father” which was written by Bill Ayers? How about our good pal Jeremiah Wright? Speaking of Bill Ayers… hasn’t he had a deep seeded hatred of America since… oh… say… the sixties….. also, what does this have to do with this page on my site?

      o_o Interesting.

      • October 10, 2009 12:13 pm

        My comments relate to your post because you’re not really helping anything. See once upon a time people were either proud to be American or wanted to be America. But then some parasites discovered they could make millions off the masses that would follow them and propagate their “talking points”. Today the country I love and served is hurting.

        As for Palin, please look at the reality. She quit as Gov as soon as she got a book deal. She quit to expedite getting paid off that. Her primary objective of what she’s doing now is to boost book sales. Her secondary goal is to get more poor people to give what little they have to her “fund” so she can milk that.

        Now let’s be really really open and honest here. If she was ugly and flat chested, nobody would be listening to her.

  6. October 10, 2009 1:47 pm

    I’m not hurting anything either. Much like you’re not helping anything… so, that’s that. Once upon a time people WERE proud of America. We had presidents that weren’t driving us into bankruptcy, socializing various industries, leading as a dictator, pushing votes through without the citizens’ approval or knowledge, ignoring our troops and military in the middle of a war, going around the world to apologize for how “crappy” America is, wasn’t sympathizing with terrorists while turning their back on our allies… you see – we had reason to BE proud of America.

    You make a valid point: Some parasites DO make millions off the masses with talking points. Olbermann, Michael Moore, Bill Ayers as I’ve previously stated, Barack Hussein Obama himself. You’re right. This country is hurting. When will Obama wake up and actually do something productive? When will he turn the economy around? When will he “stimulate” it? When will he create the jobs he’s been mindlessly chanting about since the campaign? When will he give our dying, fighting troops the time, attention, and support they need? When will he show respect for our allies and show our enemies that we won’t tolerate their desires to destroy us? When will he stop giving Iran ego boosts and the “go ahead” to develop and manufacture nuclear weapons? What about North Korea?

    Can’t forget this little gem:

    As for Palin, perhaps she resigned because she has other political plans? Perhaps she resigned because she couldn’t focus on serving Alaskans with all of the frivolous lawsuits being filed against her. Perhaps she resigned for personal reasons. Either way, the people of Alaska miss her – but she didn’t leave them hanging. She has been replaced as governor. She didn’t continue to hold the position while she went off to work on personal issues. Unlike Barack Obama. He kept his senate seat the whole time he campaigned. He collected the paycheque for being senator up until he resigned. he didn’t accomplish a thing before the campaign; voting “present” on most bills that made it to his desk, and he sure didn’t accomplish anything productive while he was campaigning. Much like his presidency, eh? Funny how that works.

    Also, could you explain why Palin’s book already PRE-SOLD over a million copies before she even released it? Palin’s book is alreadi number one on Amazon and Barnes & Noble and it’s not even set to be released until November 17th! Bet you anything that her book outsells both of the books with Obama’s name as the title. Sure, she’s making money off of it.

    This might be of interest to you as well:
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/19/obama-book-deal-500k-adva_n_176837.html

    About a week later, shortly before his inauguration, Obama agreed to a $500,000 advance for an abridged version of “Dreams From My Father” that would be suitable for middle school or young adult readers, according to a new personal financial disclosure report released this week.

    Obama will get $250,000 of the advance and the publisher will get the other half, a White House spokesman said Thursday, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to be quoted by name.

    And THIS is from a liberally slanted source. Funny though; His words aren’t even worth what Palin was offered. Shows who is just a bit more popular, eh? Shows that the number of people who want to hear Palin’s story and what she has to say outweigh those who want to hear what BarryO has to say. Oh the hilarity.

    Also, when you say “Her secondary goal is to get more poor people to give what little they have to her “fund” so she can milk that.” Do you have a source for this? Or are you referring to ALL Americans when you say “poor people” – because you know deep inside that Barack Obama is slowly driving us all into poverty so that we all become dependent on the government teat? Also, “poor people” who spend money on books – when they’re “poor” don’t have their priorities straight, do they? I find this statement to be laughable. Laughable indeed.

    Sure we’ll be honest. If she looked like Hillary Clinton or Nancy Pelosi; but still stood behind her beliefs – her morals and principals… The life she lives would still be an inspiration to conservatives. You see, conservatives aren’t all wrapped up in “beauty queens” and hot chicks. It’s substance that fuels us. We like Palin for what she stands for; not her jugs and her looks. Now, let’s turn the coin: if Hillary Clinton, Michelle Obama, and Nancy Pelosi (three of the most hideous left wingers to ever grace the surface of the Earth) WEREN’T liberals; and had the same values and morals as Palin – people would ignore their looks and actually listen to them. They would applaud them. They would respect them… however, this is not the case.

    Nice try kiddo! 🙂

  7. Ann culter permalink
    October 10, 2009 7:55 pm

    As usual the only way anyone can defend palin is by bashing democrats. If she’s anything more then a MILF why can’t any defend her without knocking others?

    KYJelly is a great lube because it works and is water soluble, not because butter turns running and only lasts a few seconds. See I defended something without having to bash something else.

    • October 10, 2009 8:05 pm

      Well, to be fair “Real Prick” started this discussion by bashing various republicans and conservatives including Sarah Palin. All I did was compare and contrast the differences between a handful of “leftists” – while “defending” Sarah Palin by stating facts and backing up my argument.

      Naturally liberals have this hate for her because she embodies everything that America stands for – and her popularity, despite the liberals’ attempts at destroying her and her image have failed. Funny, huh?

      Now, “Bashing” would be accurate if I misrepresented various liberals, but I didn’t. If you can prove anything I said to be false, I welcome it. Prove me wrong – and you might be taken seriously. 🙂

    • October 10, 2009 8:06 pm

      Oh, and I love your broken English!

    • October 10, 2009 8:33 pm

      Hi Ann Cunter,
      Sarah Palin can stand on her own merits. I would like you to judge Obama by those he surrounds himself with and see if you agree that he comes up a Chicago style dirtbag. I was pro Sarah Palin before she ever was in the running and wondered why she wasn’t. I started looking when she was pregnant and said she would go through with the pregnancy. She puts herself where her mouth is.
      Bob A.
      boudoca_bpi@boudica.us

      • October 10, 2009 11:59 pm

        lmao. Bob, you crack me up to no end. For some reason these liberals seem to have “selective compassion” along with “selective hearing” and “selective learning”. They only let what they THINK they want to know sink in; and completely ignore the facts and the obvious.

        Too bad for them, although I hear ignorance is bliss.

        I wonder if this is true.

  8. October 11, 2009 1:25 am

    Hey,
    I always enjoy hearing from you and enjoy your comments here as well as on my site. Sarah Palin is not a hatemonger and Ann Cunter along with redprick is a little fu%$@d up.
    Bob

    • October 11, 2009 1:49 am

      I visit your site more often than you think I do. I don’t comment much, but I do visit. 🙂 I should comment more. Hell, I love getting ’em. Even if they are from clueless hate-spewing liberals with no intelligence to back their “arguments” up.

      Sarah Palin is one of a kind. We need more people like her on this Earth.

  9. October 11, 2009 4:08 am

    I’ve never once said I like anything about Obama. He has the majority of every branch of government and still hasn’t got anything done, it’s been almost a year. Now I’m getting off point…. what I said was I hate hate mongers, especially hate mongers that do it just to turn a profit, and I sited a few examples of people that fall into that sad category. Jeremiah Wrigh, Bill Ayres and almost every news anchor today are also good examples.

    Sadly, I still haven’t heard anyone say what Palin’s done that’s worth writing about. One person mentioned that she kept working after getting knocked up. Millions of other women have no choice but to do same thing but who ray for Sarah… I guess. Someone else pointed out that she pre-sold a bunch of copies of her book. That drives home my point that she reneged on her sworn oath to be Gov. so she could go pull the stunts she’s been pulling to boost her book sales.

    Staying in office would have been tough on her. She wouldn’t have made as much money as she is now but she would have proven her innocence. You heard me! I think she’d have won every case. But, instead she chose the easy more profitable path, which speaks volumes about her true character.

    • October 11, 2009 1:51 pm

      You didn’t have to say you liked Obama. He just falls into the category; well, your idea of “hate mongers” who do it to make profit. Nothing wrong with comparing and contrasting, eh?

      Now, if you’re really so interested in what Sarah Palin has done that’s worth writing a book about; read it. It’s not like she pumped out two books before she did ANYTHING like Obama did. But, I know you’re just going to sit here and spew hate about her before you read the book (gasp – a hate monger?!) First and foremost; her accomplishments with her family are number one. She’s pro-life and as conservatives a lot of us love it. Not only does she SAY she’s pro-life, but she IS pro-life. Like Bob said “She puts herself where her mouth is.”
      She stands firm in her religious beliefs, but this isn’t exactly an “accomplishment” – just a character quality. She ROCKED the Alaskan budged with tax-cuts and her own personal spending; saving Alaskans assloads of money, She protected teacher’s pensions, she is pro-DRILLING FOR OUR OWN natural resources rather than depending on other countries to feed our fuel needs; tripled the funding for special needs children, sold the private jet purchased by the previous Alaskan governor and opted for less expensive travel means. Can’t forget “House Bill 4001” and “3001” – but I’ll let you google them. I can’t do all the work FOR you. She SUPPORTS the troops and does a lot of work with them; and she understands the importance of victory.

      I could go on, but why? There’s no need to defend Palin against one hate monger on the internet that seems to think she’s some sort of monster based on what the media fed him. Right? Of course I’m right.

      Now, sure, she could have stayed in office, but like I said before – and I’m sure you just overlooked it; As for Palin, perhaps she resigned because she has other political plans? Perhaps she resigned because she couldn’t focus on serving Alaskans with all of the frivolous lawsuits being filed against her. Perhaps she resigned for personal reasons. Either way, the people of Alaska miss her – but she didn’t leave them hanging. She has been replaced as governor. She didn’t continue to hold the position while she went off to work on personal issues. How could she continue to serve the citizens of Alaska when she’s being bombarded with frivolous lawsuits with no merit? She still has to pay off these legal debts, regardless of the lawsuits and what they’re for. We can thank the Obamatards in Alaska who saw her as a threat and felt the need to “help” Obama by “tainting” Palin’s image. It worked for the weak minded, but majority of us didn’t fall for the bullshit.

      Also, her innocence in what exactly? I can’t think of anyone with a triple-digit I.Q. that things she’s “guilty” of anything. Isn’t that how it goes in America? Innocent until proven guilty? Or did Obama change that, too? Again, how can she properly serve the citizens of Alaska if she’s constantly in and out of court? Who’s to say that once she won ONE lawsuit, another frivolous one wouldn’t be filed? That’s liberal tactics for you. If you can’t beat ’em – destroy their character. Yet, they’ve failed. Palin’s as popular as ever, except for a select handful of hate mongers who are hellbent on destroying her character; no matter how many times their attempts fail.

      You can try to bash Palin all you want, but we have bigger things to worry about here. I personally support the capitalist system and applaud her for her success in her book. Are you telling me that if you got a book deal (Bwuahaha) you wouldn’t take it?

      Also, if she’s as unpopular as the portrait you paint; why was she offered much MUCH more money on her book than Obama? Why are her PRE-SALE numbers higher than most newly released books’ CURRENT sales? Number one, my friend. The numbers speak for themselves.

      Again, nice try. 😀

  10. October 11, 2009 6:05 pm

    FINALLY somebody actually stated some things Palin’s done.

    I do however have to comment on the statement “her accomplishments with her family are number one”. I know you young folk think it’s just fine for girls to give it up for the boys at school and get knocked up out of wed lock, but my church still believes it’s wrong. Good parents don’t let their children fall that far down Satan’s pit.

    But from what I’m hearing here, let’s follow the highest book sales. Steven King for President 2012 ! ! !

    • October 11, 2009 6:41 pm

      Those things I stated are just a tiny fragment of her overall accomplishments. Common knowledge between most conservatives and republicans, and yes – even educated democrats.

      While you sit there being a hate monger, against a child(at the time she got pregnant she was seventeen) – but you’ve also got to take into consideration FREE WILL. Sh how young exactly was Stanley Ann Dunham when she got knocked up out of wedlock? OH MY! SHE WAS KNOCKED UP AT THE AGE OF SEVENTEEN – AND GAVE BIRTH AT THE AGE OF EIGHTEEN!! GASPZ! Imagine that, huh?

      You can mindlessly follow whatever some “religious institution” tells you; but I can tell you they’re wrong if they’re the morons who put the idea that minors who get pregnant or engage in sexual activities are falling down “Satan’t pit”.

      Also, your brain doesn’t seem to function properly. Nowhere did anyone say Palin was qualified to be president because of book sales. It’s her politics and policies. It’s her record. Her personality.

      Silly! 🙂 But again, I applaud you for your effort.

      How old are YOU, anyway? We “young folk” are curious.

    • October 11, 2009 10:00 pm

      “I know you young folk think it’s just fine for girls to give it up for the boys at school and get knocked up out of wed lock, but my church still believes it’s wrong. Good parents don’t let their children fall that far down Satan’s pit.”

      I would perhaps correct your statement to Good Parents don’t want their children to fall that far down Satan’s pit. In fact I don’t believe any parent wants their child to “get knocked up”. It happens and there is nothing a parent can do once it does. I’m not young but do know several young girls that have fallen, are single and with the help of family picked themselves up work and take care of and love their child as much as any other parent, and are not on the public dole.

      • October 11, 2009 11:28 pm

        Typical Liberals. You see, when something “unfavourable” happens to a conservative or a republican; oh hell no. It’s completely unacceptable. But when it happens to a leftist nobody even bats an eye. They claim to be anti-“hate-mongers”, yet promote unjustified hate all the time.

        We conservatives even admire Bristol – because, yes, even though she did get pregnant at a young age, she didn’t take the “easy way out”. She stood up and took responsibility for the choice she Levi, made. The choice to have premarital sex at a young age. She went through with the pregnancy, she’s raising her son, and she seems to be very happy.

        Funny. I’m referred to as “young folk” – yet my I.Q. and common sense capabilities seem to be much higher than that old fart’s.

      • October 11, 2009 11:30 pm

        Oh, and as far as “young folk think it’s just fine for girls to give it up for the boys at school and get knocked up out of wed lock”; you can thank public education, MtV, and the Hollywood scene for that. Not the Palins.

  11. sarahbaram permalink
    December 11, 2009 9:27 pm

    Did it ever occur to you that we are in Iraq and Afghanistan BECAUSE of Bush? The deaths are far from being Obama’s fault. He is doing the best he can to subdue both wars. You are incredibly misinformed.

    • December 11, 2009 10:14 pm

      Aw. You just can’t get enough of my blog! I’m touched! No, it never occurred to me that we are in Iraq and Afghanistan BECAUSE of Bush That would be absurd and constitute me as “misinformed”. We are at war because war was declared against us in the name of Jihad. The deaths that occur while Obama is the “Commander in Chief” ARE his fault because he is “not interested in victory”, weakens our defenses, sympathizes with terrorists, doesn’t support our troops, turns his back on our allies, fails to give our troops the support and reinforcement they need, emboldens our enemies, releases captured terrorists, and takes his sweet time in “making decisions” that could potentially SAVE Troops’ lives, so no. He is NOT doing the best he can to “subdue” both wars. You are incredibly misinformed.

    • December 11, 2009 10:17 pm

      Bush is no longer President. B. Hussein is and now he is the one that is responsible and must take the blame. Time to stop blaming Bush, even though he is not blameless. It all lies on Obama now, he is responsible (or irresponsible).

      • December 11, 2009 10:26 pm

        Absolutely. But, like I’ve said before: He’ll continue to point fingers until his last days in office. Some people CHOOSE to be ignorant. Liberals.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: